Posts
Why Most Challenging Situations Training Misses the Point Completely
Here's something that'll ruffle a few feathers: 87% of workplace "challenging situations" aren't actually challenging at all—they're just poorly managed ordinary situations that spiralled out of control.
After seventeen years bouncing between corporate training rooms, union halls, and boardrooms across Australia, I've seen enough deer-in-headlights expressions to fill the MCG. And here's what really gets under my skin: we keep teaching people to "handle" challenging situations instead of teaching them to prevent the bloody things in the first place.
The Real Problem Nobody Talks About
Most challenging situations training focuses on damage control. Fire fighting. Crisis management. It's like teaching someone to perform CPR but never mentioning that regular exercise might prevent the heart attack.
I was running a session in Perth last month—won't name the company, but let's just say they're big in mining—and during the break, one of the supervisors pulled me aside. "Mate," he said, "we've had three workplace disputes this quarter alone. All from the same team."
When I dug deeper, turns out their team leader had been promoted six months earlier with zero people management training. Zero. They threw him in the deep end and then wondered why everyone was drowning.
What Actually Works (And What Doesn't)
Here's my controversial take: most challenging situations aren't about conflict resolution or de-escalation techniques. They're about basic human psychology and communication skills that should've been taught from day one.
The best challenging situations training I've seen doesn't start with role-playing angry customers or difficult employees. It starts with understanding why people become challenging in the first place. And spoiler alert: it's usually because they feel unheard, undervalued, or misunderstood.
Take customer complaints, for instance. Nine times out of ten, the customer isn't angry about the actual problem—they're angry about how the problem was handled. Or ignored. Or dismissed.
I learned this the hard way early in my career. Had a client who was absolutely losing it over a training cancellation. Proper meltdown. Old me would've gone straight into "let's find a solution" mode. Instead, I shut up and listened. Really listened. Turns out, this was the third cancellation they'd experienced across different providers, and they had a board presentation the following week that depended on their team being trained.
The "challenging situation" wasn't the cancellation. It was three consecutive disappointments and the fear of professional embarrassment.
The Melbourne Approach vs. The Brisbane Method
Different cities, different approaches. In Melbourne, I've noticed organisations tend to over-engineer their challenging situations protocols. Everything's documented, there's a flowchart for everything, and people spend more time consulting the manual than actually dealing with the human being in front of them.
Brisbane's more laid-back, which works brilliantly until it doesn't. The relaxed approach builds great relationships, but when things do escalate, people sometimes lack the structured framework to fall back on.
Sydney? Well, Sydney thinks everything's urgent and challenging, even ordering lunch. Adelaide keeps things refreshingly practical—probably the most balanced approach I've encountered.
The Emotional Intelligence Blind Spot
This brings me to another unpopular opinion: we've made emotional intelligence so complicated that people think they need a psychology degree to have a conversation with an upset colleague.
Emotional intelligence in challenging situations is actually quite simple:
- Notice what's happening (in them and in you)
- Pause before reacting
- Respond to what they need, not what they're saying
That's it. The emotional intelligence training that actually sticks keeps it practical, not theoretical.
I remember training a team of call centre supervisors in Adelaide—brilliant people, technically excellent, but they'd freeze the moment someone raised their voice. We didn't spend weeks on emotional intelligence theory. We spent three hours on breathing techniques, another two on vocal tone matching, and the rest practising with increasingly ridiculous scenarios.
By the end, they were handling "challenging" calls like seasoned negotiators. Because they weren't thinking about emotional intelligence—they were just being intelligent about emotions.
The Script Problem
Here's where most training providers get it wrong: they give people scripts. Templates. Prescribed responses for challenging situations.
Scripts are training wheels. They work fine while you're learning, but eventually, you need to take them off.
Real challenging situations are messy, unpredictable, and rarely follow the scenario you practised in the training room. The person having a meltdown over the photocopier hasn't read your de-escalation manual. They don't know they're supposed to calm down after you use your "active listening" voice.
Better approach? Teach principles, not scripts. Teach people to read situations, not recite responses.
Why Context Matters More Than Techniques
Every industry has its own flavour of challenging situations. What works in retail won't work in healthcare. What works in construction definitely won't work in education.
I've delivered the same "challenging situations" training to law firms and childcare centres. Same principles, completely different applications. The lawyers needed help with aggressive opposing counsel and demanding clients. The childcare workers needed strategies for anxious parents and behaviour management.
One size definitely doesn't fit all. Yet most training providers trot out the same generic content regardless of industry context.
The mining supervisor dealing with safety concerns has different needs from the restaurant manager handling customer complaints. But somehow, we expect the same conflict resolution techniques to work for both? Please.
The Follow-Up Nobody Does
Here's the dirty secret of challenging situations training: most of it evaporates within a fortnight if there's no follow-up. People revert to old patterns under pressure. It's human nature.
The organisations that actually see lasting change from workplace training build in regular check-ins, peer coaching, and real-world practice opportunities. They understand that handling challenging situations is a skill that needs maintenance, not a one-time inoculation.
Technology and Challenging Situations
While everyone's talking about AI replacing jobs, I'm more interested in how technology can help us handle challenging situations better. Video call training, for instance, has introduced a whole new category of challenging situations that didn't exist five years ago.
Ever tried to de-escalate someone who's on mute? Or deal with a difficult conversation when half the participants are dealing with connection issues? These are real challenges that traditional training simply doesn't address.
The smart organisations are adapting. The rest are still teaching face-to-face techniques for an increasingly digital world.
The Bottom Line
Challenging situations training that actually works focuses on three things: prevention through better communication, practical skills over theoretical frameworks, and ongoing practice rather than one-off workshops.
Everything else is just expensive theatre.
Most people aren't naturally difficult—they become difficult when their needs aren't met or their concerns aren't addressed. Fix the underlying issues, and you'll find challenging situations become remarkably unchallengeing.
The best investment any organisation can make isn't in crisis management training. It's in communication skills, emotional awareness, and leadership development that prevents most challenging situations from occurring in the first place.
Because the truth is, handling challenging situations well is less about what you do in the moment and more about everything you did leading up to that moment.
Our Favourite Blogs: